On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:25 AM Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> I do welcome the cleanup, of course, just I would have defined GCC 4.2 as
> the breaking point instead of 5.0.
>
The breaking point is headed to gcc9 and clang11. There's no compelling
FreeBSD project use case where people need to compile Fr
I do welcome the cleanup, of course, just I would have defined GCC 4.2 as the
breaking point instead of 5.0.
Due basically to the licensing issues, GCC 4.2 became a natural reference for
GCC versions. At some point there were vendors actually shipping FreeBSD with
GCC 4.2, and it was not a hug
Indeed. But none of the ones that I removed are affected by this quirk
since they are true for clang all versions.
Warner
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 12:47 PM Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> It was long ago when I last touched this but FWIW ...
>
> clang used to report itself as GCC 4.2 and kept it's GCC ex
It was long ago when I last touched this but FWIW ...
clang used to report itself as GCC 4.2 and kept it's GCC extension support
level consistent with that version so these version numbers were relevant.
Pedro.
On Thursday, June 20, 2024 at 09:41:34 PM GMT-5, Warner Losh
wrote:
The br
The branch main has been updated by imp:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=d5c01e1124ffa4adb2513e7e8d708d7072dbfc75
commit d5c01e1124ffa4adb2513e7e8d708d7072dbfc75
Author: Warner Losh
AuthorDate: 2024-06-20 23:03:15 +
Commit: Warner Losh
CommitDate: 2024-06-21 02:41:09 +
