On 3/28/21 6:20 AM, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:21:43 -0400
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Is there a reason this can't use makefs's boot-image support directly in
future, like hybrid systems on other architectures? It already supports
all the complex interleaving of partition tables
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:21:43 -0400
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Is there a reason this can't use makefs's boot-image support directly in
> future, like hybrid systems on other architectures? It already supports
> all the complex interleaving of partition tables with ISO9660 for other
> schemes (e
Is there a reason this can't use makefs's boot-image support directly in
future, like hybrid systems on other architectures? It already supports
all the complex interleaving of partition tables with ISO9660 for other
schemes (e.g. MBR and APM) and could probably be extended without much
trouble
> The branch main has been updated by manu:
>
> URL:
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=90d2f7c413f9fc4ac479fa5e91ba1de6d4ea8d45
>
> commit 90d2f7c413f9fc4ac479fa5e91ba1de6d4ea8d45
> Author: Emmanuel Vadot
> AuthorDate: 2021-03-27 11:04:51 +
> Commit: Emmanuel Vadot
> Commit
The branch main has been updated by manu:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=90d2f7c413f9fc4ac479fa5e91ba1de6d4ea8d45
commit 90d2f7c413f9fc4ac479fa5e91ba1de6d4ea8d45
Author: Emmanuel Vadot
AuthorDate: 2021-03-27 11:04:51 +
Commit: Emmanuel Vadot
CommitDate: 2021-03-27 11:
