Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1392
Tested and LGTM.
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1459
LGTM and merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user hayssams commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1479
@Leemoonsoo
Test testClose in org.apache.zeppelin.python.PythonInterpreterTest. Can't
understand why it is failing on travis CI but not failing on my laptop.
---
If your project is set up
Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1392
@Leemoonsoo is it possible to merge it in couple of hour? some of my work
will depends on this PR :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user snowch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1531
[ZEPPELIN-1314] dump out the R command
This PR replaces https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1309/
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://gith
Github user snaveenp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1510
All checks have passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1515
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
@khalidhuseynov Thanks for testing it. I'll change it to get user
information from fromMessage.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Khalid Huseynov created ZEPPELIN-1557:
-
Summary: Storage layer sync mechanism doesn't fail gracefully
Key: ZEPPELIN-1557
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1557
Project: Zeppelin
GitHub user khalidhuseynov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1532
[Zeppelin-1557] Graceful storage exception handling
### What is this PR for?
Graceful handling of errors in storage sync layer
### What type of PR is it?
Bug Fix | Improvem
Github user snowch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1309
Damn, I had deleted my forked repository. I've created a new PR here:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1531
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1524
Looks interesting!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1499
@sadikovi Thanks for the contribution. I have a question of the design.
This looks focused SparkInterpreter only. In case of another interpreters
doesn't have any progress info that you implement
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1520
@kavinkumarks I'm looking into this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1532
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1479
@hayssams Why did you removed `provided` scope? If it doesn't, all kind of
hadoop dependencies will be included in zengine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
@zjffdu I have no idea in your case. Are you still suffering from it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user vectorijk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1530
@bzz I have updated and added unit test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user hayssams commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1479
@jongyoul
When using provided and bringing in all hadoop dependencies to zengine by
adding hadoop lib in HADOOP_CONF_DIR to the classpath, Zeppelin raise an
exception at runtime.
Ho
Github user sadikovi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1499
@jongyoul yes, you are right, it was built mainly for Spark, and I have
taken a naive approach of showing progress info only when non-empty array is
returned, otherwise you will not see progress
Rob Heiser created ZEPPELIN-1558:
Summary: REST endpoint for changing paragraph configuration
Key: ZEPPELIN-1558
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1558
Project: Zeppelin
Iss
CloverHearts created ZEPPELIN-1559:
--
Summary: Code Editor slow performance of the many Notebooks.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1559
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1559
Project: Zeppelin
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1533
[ ZEPPELIN-1559 ] Code Editor slow performance resolve of the many
Notebooks
### What is this PR for?
Currently, if you have a Notebook large number of,
There is a sharp decrease in
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1533
added jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1513
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1533
[ ZEPPELIN-1559 ] Code Editor slow performance resolve of the many
Notebooks
### What is this PR for?
Currently, if you have a Notebook large number of,
There is a sharp decrease
Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1533
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1533
Tested and confirmed angular watcher reduced from 5xxx -> 3xx in case of 1k
notes. Great work!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1470
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1501
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1524
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1524
doesn't `tearDown()` remove whole directory?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
Thank you @cloverhearts for the UI work. Can you share your screenshot for
this feature? It can help everyone understand your awesome work!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1532
Looks great to me!
Merging to master, if there is no further discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
Thank you @jongyoul
ui - screenshot.
shiro off (anonymous user)

---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1392
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1459
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user vectorijk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1530
cc @Leemoonsoo @jongyoul
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1460
Looks good to me. CI is green now.
What do you think, @Leemoonsoo ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1460
there could be another option of casting `Job` into `Paragraph` if the job
passed in here is in reality `instanceof` Paragraph. maybe @Leemoonsoo
@jongyoul could comment on it more
---
If
GitHub user agoodm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1534
[WIP]ZEPPELIN-1345 - Create a custom matplotlib backend that natively
supports inline plotting in a python interpreter cell
### What is this PR for?
This PR is the first of two major steps nee
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1524
Yeah make sense, LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Sherry Xue created ZEPPELIN-1560:
Summary: NPE in SparkInterpreter.java of Zeppelin 0.6.2
interpreter when running Zeppelin 0.6.2 with Spark 2.0.1 or Spark 1.6.1
Key: ZEPPELIN-1560
URL: https://issues.apache.org/j
Github user kavinkumarks commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1524
LGTM :+1:
Thanks,
Kavin
MailTo: kavin.ku...@imaginea.com
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
46 matches
Mail list logo