Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1475
CI failures looks irrelevant, merging it into master.
profile 2
```
[32m- should able to create AngularObject[0m
[32mAngularModel[0m
[32m- should able to update AngularObjec
Hi devs,
Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
[1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
Regards,
Mina
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1472
@djKooks Sorry for my late response. I didn't notice, but seems there is
already similar feature merged few days ago. Could you please take a look at
#1399?
---
If your project is set up for
Valentin Ursu created ZEPPELIN-1524:
---
Summary: User defined functions in Scala cannot be applied
Key: ZEPPELIN-1524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1524
Project: Zeppelin
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1487
Merging if there's no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Great job, Mina.
I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been reso
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1462
ZEPPELIN-1477. Add Integration Test for LivyInterpreter
### What is this PR for?
This PR fix several issues of LivyInterpeter test.
* Livy interpreter's test code is not in the right pla
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1462
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
[WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter
### What is this PR for?
Based on #338 , I refactor most of pig interpreter. As I don't think the
approach in #338 is the best approach. In #338, we use s
+1 for it.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee wrote:
> Great job, Mina.
>
> I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > since several critical issues have b
I also +1
On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang wrote:
> +1 for it.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee > wrote:
>
> > Great job, Mina.
> >
> > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi devs,
> > >
> > > Release pr
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
@corneadoug
Yes, no problem.
:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
+1
Thanks & Regards,
RK
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho wrote:
> I also +1
>
> On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang wrote:
>
> > +1 for it.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee > > wrote:
> >
> > > Great job, Mina.
> > >
> > > I think it's enough to release 0
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
Hey @bzz, did you get a chance to check this out? Anything I can do to help?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
+1
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> RK
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> anthonycorba...@apache.org
> > wrote:
>
> > I also +1
> >
> > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for it.
> > >
> > > On Fri, O
Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot
more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process for
0.6.2.
Thanks,
moon
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan wrote:
> +1
>
> O
Hi, Apache Zeppelin users and developers,
We're about to start a release process for 0.6.2 and i think it's good time
to discuss about future release, 0.7.0. There were great discussion about
roadmap [1] and we updated wiki page [2], but 0.7.0 section on the roadmap
wiki is empty at the moment. Ha
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1487
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
Is it possible have a non-Tez version of Pig and would it work with this
interpreter?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1475
LGTM, would be great to see Spark profiles passing in CI...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
+1
El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" escribió:
> Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot
> more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process for
> 0.6.2.
>
> Thanks,
> moon
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
Yes, it supports local, mapreduce and tez engine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
+1
2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한 메시지:
> +1
>
> El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" >
> escribió:
>
> > Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> > Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot
> > more stable than previous relea
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
Could you add documentation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
@AhyoungRyu updated licenses. The travis failures do not seems to be
related could you please restart the travis jobs?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
@ravwojdyla Only the owner can re-trigger Travis job by closing & opening
the PR :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
The tests are failing for:
```
Tests run: 9, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 119.221 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT
t
+1
On 8 Oct 2016 5:42 a.m., "Hyung Sung Shim" wrote:
> +1
>
> 2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한 메시지:
>
> > +1
> >
> > El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" >
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> > > Current 0.6 branch resolves many
+1
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Prabhjyot Singh
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 8 Oct 2016 5:42 a.m., "Hyung Sung Shim" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한
> 메시지:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" >
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Although 0.6.1 su
30 matches
Mail list logo
