@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Review process
We are speaking in this thread about two reviewers on big PR, but there are PRs
without any reviewers =)
What contributor can do if his PR have not been reviewed for 4 week?
For example https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2684
Thanks,
Maksim
: Jongyoul Lee [mailto:jongy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 8:34 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
I agree with some large PR should be delayed a bit longer. What I meant is we
don't have to wait for all kind of PRs.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Felix C
nd what is big?
>
> _
> From: Anthony Corbacho
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
> To:
>
>
> I think for large PR (new feature or big change) we should still keep more
> than one approval before merging it sin
+1
What would be the rough heuristic people will be comfortable with- what is
small and what is big?
_
From: Anthony Corbacho
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
To:
I think for large PR (new feature or big change) we
> > > Also github has a tab for all PRs you are subscribed to, it shouldn’t
> be
> > > very hard to review all the approved ones again.
> > >
> > > ____________
> > > From: Jongyoul Lee
> > > Sent: Monday, December 1
t shouldn’t be
> > very hard to review all the approved ones again.
> >
> >
> > From: Jongyoul Lee
> > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 8:04:51 AM
> > To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
mmitter approval.
>
> Also github has a tab for all PRs you are subscribed to, it shouldn’t be
> very hard to review all the approved ones again.
>
>
> From: Jongyoul Lee
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 8:04:51 AM
> To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org
.
From: Jongyoul Lee
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 8:04:51 AM
To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
Good for summary. But actually, no committer merges without delay after
reviewing it. So I thought we should clarify it officially.
Now, some committers
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maksim Belousov
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jongyoul Lee [mailto:jongy...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 12:12 PM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
> >
> >
ent of Zeppelin is very important for us and we want to review
> new commits.
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2697
>
>
> Thanks,
> Maksim Belousov
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jongyoul Lee [mailto:jongy...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, D
mmits.
[1] https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2697
Thanks,
Maksim Belousov
-Original Message-
From: Jongyoul Lee [mailto:jongy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 12:12 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review process
Thank you for the replying it. I think so
On Mon
Thank you for the replying it. I think so
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer <
miquelangeland...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree, ig is necessary to have no delay afternoon merging. I think it
> will help speed up processes and help contributors
>
> El 18 dic. 2017 4:33, "Jon
I agree, ig is necessary to have no delay afternoon merging. I think it
will help speed up processes and help contributors
El 18 dic. 2017 4:33, "Jongyoul Lee" escribió:
Hi committers,
I want to suggest one thing about our reviewing process. We have the policy
to wait for one-day before merging
13 matches
Mail list logo
