Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
Sure yes, rest all LGTM
---
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
Will commit if no more discussion.
---
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
Actually this livy interprete support both livy 0.2.0 / 0.3.0 /0.4.0,
because livy's rest api doesn't change, only its java package name changes. So
I can not add integration test for both of these
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
feasibility ask: Like we support python2, and python3 do you think it makes
sense to have 2 different interpreters (at-least for now) one that supports
Livy-0.2.0/0.3.0 and other as Livy-4?
