[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2697: [Zeppelin-2964] Stop execution on schedule if the note...

2017-12-27 Thread tinkoff-dwh
Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2697 @Leemoonsoo @felixcheung there are no the comments a long time, need to merge ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2684: [Zeppelin-2572] multiple paragraphs actions

2017-12-27 Thread tinkoff-dwh
Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2684 Ready to review ---

Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

2017-12-27 Thread Jeff Zhang
I will update that jira, and anyone can link jiras that he think is critical for 0.8.0, but it is not guaranteed to be included in 0.8.0, it needs community consensus. Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer 于2017年12月28日周四 上午3:03写道: > Thanks for your help > > As you well said it would be necessary to update

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2708: [Zeppelin-3095] Fix UI when all paragraphs executing s...

2017-12-27 Thread zjffdu
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2708 @tinkoff-dwh I am not frontend expert. Just going through the PR and have a few thoughts: 1. The changes in frontend seems a little large. What if we add new UI control ? Do we also need t

Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

2017-12-27 Thread Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer
Thanks for your help As you well said it would be necessary to update the issue link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2385 only with the links that are included in the 0.8.0 Who is going to do that job? El 27 dic. 2017 19:35, "moon soo Lee" escribió: > Cool. Thanks for the volu

Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

2017-12-27 Thread moon soo Lee
Cool. Thanks for the volunteer. Why don't we update issue link of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2385? I think issue link is bit out dated. We can remove issue links if they're not expected in 0.8.0, add issue links if they must be included in 0.8.0. So everyone can track the progr

RE: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

2017-12-27 Thread Belousov Maksim Eduardovich
This is great news. Our team will take part in testing and bug fixing. Thanks, Maksim Belousov -Original Message- From: Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer [mailto:miquelangeland...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 3:46 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discussion] 0.8

RE: [DISCUSS] About isolation of database session in JDBC interpreter.

2017-12-27 Thread Belousov Maksim Eduardovich
My issue is not about user accounts inside the database. My concern is about simultaneous work of fifty analysts. The analysts could create tables with such names as "accounts", "customers", "sales". And I want to give a such solution that analysts didn't collide with each other inside database.

Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

2017-12-27 Thread Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer
Hello everyone, I think it's a good idea, I do not know if we are pending some important issues for the 0.8.0, we should see in jira. I can help with the management of the 0.8.0 release if the new release will be launched at the end of January Regards El 27 dic. 2017 13:35, "Jeff Zhang" escribi

[Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

2017-12-27 Thread Jeff Zhang
Hi folks, It is a long time since our last release, and many new features are added into 0.8.0, so I think we could think about to prepare the release of 0.8.0, if no volunteer to be the release manager, I volunteer to be the release manager of this version. My current thinking is to make the rele