Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2561
@felixcheung Please help review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2562
ZEPPELIN-2645. Adding way to register RemoteInterpreterServer's port into
InterpreterProcess
### What is this PR for?
Rebase PR #2418 , still use thrift as the communication protocol bet
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2561
ZEPPELIN-2893. Pass non spark.* of spark interpreter properties to spark
app driver
### What is this PR for?
Straightforward change for allowing pass non spark.* properties to spark
app drive
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2554
Thanks @Leemoonsoo for the review, I will merge it if no more comments. And
will do the change in the following PR as there's still remaining work for the
refactoring.
---
If your project is set
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
Actually this livy interprete support both livy 0.2.0 / 0.3.0 /0.4.0,
because livy's rest api doesn't change, only its java package name changes. So
I can not add integration test for both of these
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2554
Thanks @zjffdu for great work.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
feasibility ask: Like we support python2, and python3 do you think it makes
sense to have 2 different interpreters (at-least for now) one that supports
Livy-0.2.0/0.3.0 and other as Livy-4?
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2558
What about `PySparkInterpreter` and `SparkRInterpreter` ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2560
[ZEPPELIN-2876]. Integrate with Livy 0.4.0
### What is this PR for?
This is to integrate livy 0.4.0 which is livy's first apache release. Since
the package name is changed, I can not supp
10 matches
Mail list logo