Github user krskoondra closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user krskoondra reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
[ZEPPELIN-1637] Add button for "create next block as copy of this block"
### What is this PR for?
Added new buttton "Copy paragraph" near run button. This new button create
copy of curre
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1721
order by note name in job menu
### What is this PR for?
we can sort by note name in job menu.
Sorting supports ascending and descending order.
Sort by note name.
### What
GitHub user anthonycorbacho opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1720
Fix case where user use zeppelin in normal mode with token
### What is this PR for?
Fix the case where user use zeppelin in normal mode (doesnt use
authentication) and set zeppelinhub
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
Thank you for the verification.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
Please ignore itï¼I can ran it successfully now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
@prabhjyotsingh I can not run pyspark interpreter. Can you try that in
your enviroment ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1719
missing lastExecuteTime function
### What is this PR for?
Added last note run time.
This was a bug.
The function was configured, but the function to output it was missing.
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user minahlee commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commit/b6cd47996038bafd3c05caf8f17b26f0d30f3224#commitcomment-20043963
In testing/downloadSpark.sh:
In testing/downloadSpark.sh on line 23:
Thank you for pointing it out! I created #1718 to r
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1717
replace to movement for paragraph in job menu
### What is this PR for?
We should move to editable paragraph move in job menu
currently, moved to readonly mode
### What type o
GitHub user minahlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1718
[HOTFIX] Restore uninteded change of exit code in testing/dowloadSpark.sh
### What is this PR for?
This PR rollbacks unintended change of exit code in
`testing/downloadSpark.sh` after #1599
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1630
Tested and working really nicely. Looks awesome to me!
Thanks @tae-jun for the great contribution!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
CloverHearts created ZEPPELIN-1744:
--
Summary: We should move to editable paragraph move in job menu
Key: ZEPPELIN-1744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1744
Project: Zeppelin
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
CI test failed with
```
Results :
Tests in error:
ParagraphActionsIT.testRemoveButton:155->AbstractZeppelinIT.clickAndWait:131 »
ElementNotVisible
ParagraphActi
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1661
@bzz Thank you for review, I just rebased. And yes, the way you described
is correct way to test this PR, I updated it in description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user tae-jun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
Good feature!
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
Thanks @soralee for the nice improvement.
Tested and LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1716
[ ZEPPELIN-531 ] execute and stop note in job menu
### What is this PR for?
We can note start and stop in job menu.
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
### T
GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1675
[ZEPPELIN-1190] [WIP] Visit and switch notebook revisions
### What is this PR for?
This is the last step for enabling Zeppelin to work with revisions. It
addresses ability to visit c
Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1675
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1711
I think test failures are irrelevant to this change. Ready to review.
```
AngularElem
- should able to be created from implicit conversion
Run completed in 1 second, 632 mill
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1712
Tested and LGTM. Thanks @khalidhuseynov for the update.
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
GitHub user soralee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
[ZEPPELIN-1740] Focus next paragraph after paragraph deletion
### What is this PR for?
This PR is for moving focus next paragraph after paragraph deletion using
Ctrl-Alt-D.
After paragrap
Ilya Malyanov created ZEPPELIN-1743:
---
Summary: Frontend refactoring: use explicit arguments in functions
in paragraph.controller.js
Key: ZEPPELIN-1743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1743
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1714
Looks great to me, thank you @felizbear for frontend code improvements!
Let's wait for CI, meanwhile, would you mind creating a JIRA issue please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
Now `CHECKSTYLE=1` passes CI.
(https://travis-ci.org/1ambda/zeppelin/jobs/180609577)
But I can't find checkstyle `WARN` log starting with prefix `[WARN]` in
travis CI log for example,
GitHub user felizbear opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1714
Fe explicit arguments
### What is this PR for?
This is `paragraph.controller.js` maintenance PR. It refactors most
functions in paragraph controller to accept explicit parameters instead of
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1708
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1500
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
I see what you mean, for profile not included in build roster by default we
would need to update the CI profile. Well, it's 12s * 10 (number of profile we
have no), which looks like 2min time, but we
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1703
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1705
Thanks @rhymoid, I am refactoring LivyInterpreter now in #1612 ,
refactoring LivyHelp is my next step.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1612
ZEPPELIN-1607. Refactor Livy Interpreter to adapt scope mode
### What is this PR for?
ZEPPELIN-1606 will make scoped mode as the default interpreter mode of
livy. This PR is to refactor livy
Github user purechoc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1587
@zjffdu
thanks to comment.
i am wait #1612
#1612 is LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user rhymoid commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1705
I'm closing this PR, as I now understand that 0.6.3 will not happen. The
only thing this PR contributes is some tests for `LivyHelper`, but that class
needs a complete rewrite anyway.
---
If you
Github user rhymoid closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1705
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhymoid closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1710
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi there! Sorry for such a late reply! In the screenshot, I was thinking
that run would refer to a circumstance where someone runs the entire note
(as a cron or something) while update would be upon paragraph execution.
However, those are very much open to change as they were just general use
cases
GitHub user lresende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1713
[ZEPPELIN-1530] Update common scripts for Linux and Windows platforms
### What is this PR for?
Avoid forcing set the DEBUG environment variable and also review the two
common scripts for Lin
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1284
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1697
normally when doing this kind of changes, need to:
1. either override `equals` method or make explicitly static `isEmpty`
method that would handle comparison cases. (e.g.
`revision1.e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1707
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1702
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user mfelgamal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1538
@bzz I removed `curl build-base make gcc g++` for decreasing the image
size, now it's `301 MB`.
And `R` is run well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
@bzz
Recently, i found that checkstyle doesn't need too much time. It takes
apprx 12 seconds in my labtop.
So i believe it is such a big problem of executing checkstyle plugin in all
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1697
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
GitHub user khalidhuseynov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1712
send error info popup
### What is this PR for?
To notify user when commit of note revision have failed.
### What type of PR is it?
Bug Fix | Improvement
### T
Khalid Huseynov created ZEPPELIN-1742:
-
Summary: Failed or non-supported checkpoint of note doesn't notify
user
Key: ZEPPELIN-1742
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1742
Project:
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
Sounds great! What is rationale for having checkstyle running everywhere +
a separate profile?
Would it make sense to measure the CI build time with\without separate
profile and see if there
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
@bzz
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689/commits/56dfa5232ef3cc58c147f8512cd37d4d3d6e8c4f
This commit added the `CHECKSTYLE=1` profile which printing all WARN.
And rest
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
With number of PRs we have I'm a bit lost, which one will introduce a
separate checkstyle CI profile and skip it in all the rest?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
@bzz I'v just rebased
I will add some commits enumerated above and then mention you when ready.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user tae-jun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1630
@AhyoungRyu @soralee Yeah! CI is green!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
58 matches
Mail list logo
