Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1588
@anthonycorbacho thanks for contribution. as far as i can see, this is kind
of promiscuous mode for websockets. @Leemoonsoo any comments? Also maybe remove
`WIP` from title
---
If your pr
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1538
Additionally, It would be better to
- run zeppelin immediately (using `zeppelin.sh` because we can run docker
as daemon mode)
- allow user to modify config important config files by pa
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1538
@mfelgamal
I tried `zeppelin-release:0.6.0` image but it failed to run spark code in
`Zeppelin Tutorial`
```
$ docker ps
CONTAINER IDIMAGE
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1534
Great, thank you for digging it through.
Any more comment?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1538
@mfelgamal Could you tell me more detail about the issue on `from 0.6.0v to
0.6.2v` ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1596
I think cleaner way to remove `open()` inside of `jobRun()` could be call
`open()` inside of
[LazyOpenInterpreter.getHook()](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-interpreter/
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1594
@Leemoonsoo Thanks for review ð
It would be better to
1. Use pegdown as default
2. Add docs for it
3. Revert markdown4j
Regarding to rendered output you provide
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1606
@AhyoungRyu @anthonycorbacho addressed your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1596
Think about it more, I don't have strong preference on this PR. As name
`LazyOpenInterpreter` seems to imply it would call `open` method when
`interpret` method is called. My purpose is to try to p
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1596
@agoodm @Leemoonsoo I found the issue, this is due that to
`PySparkInterpreter` depends on `SparkInterpreter`. So before opening
`PySparkInterpreter` we should creating `SparkInterpreter`. But see
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1594
And i think it'll be better mention in
`docs/install/upgrade.html#upgrading-from-zeppelin-06-to-07` about default
markdown parser change and result slightly different output rendering of
markd
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1594
Thanks @1ambda for the contribution.
I have compared output from markdown4j and pegdown and found some
differences.
font difference
)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1606
[ZEPPELIN-777] Math formula support
### What is this PR for?
This PR adds support for formatting math formula formatting in %html
display system using MathJax library.
Note that,
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1534
LGTM.
Is there any known issue with SELENIUM tests? from a quick glance it seems
to have failed a few times here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
@felixcheung thanks. Apache Mahout is a kind of special case, in that
really we're a set of libraries that can run on currently Spark, Flink, H20
runners, and possible additionals ones (such a
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
@bzz,
- I could see usecases either way. So i've added the
`--overwrite_existing` flag. If that flag is called it will delete current
`%sparkMahout` and `%flinkMahout` interpreters.
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
@rawkintrevo thank you for addressing the feedback promptly.
I tried examples and everything worked very well!
One thing though - on the second run of `add_mahout.py` I got
```
20 matches
Mail list logo
