Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-11 Thread John D. Ament
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:32 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:21 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:15 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM, John D. Ament > >> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM sebb wrote: > >> > > >> >>

Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-11 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:21 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:15 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 10 June 2017 at 15:52, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> > I think ther

Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-11 Thread sebb
On 11 June 2017 at 13:21, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:15 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 10 June 2017 at 15:52, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> > I think there's a b

Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-11 Thread John D. Ament
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:15 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM sebb wrote: > > > >> On 10 June 2017 at 15:52, John D. Ament wrote: > >> > I think there's a bug with how the caching works for podlings.xml, but > >>

Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-11 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM sebb wrote: > >> On 10 June 2017 at 15:52, John D. Ament wrote: >> > I think there's a bug with how the caching works for podlings.xml, but >> I'm >> > not sure if it's something I introduced or something I'

Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-11 Thread John D. Ament
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM sebb wrote: > On 10 June 2017 at 15:52, John D. Ament wrote: > > I think there's a bug with how the caching works for podlings.xml, but > I'm > > not sure if it's something I introduced or something I'm just noticing. > > > > I would expect that the cache is comp

Re: Podlings.xml caching

2017-06-10 Thread sebb
On 10 June 2017 at 15:52, John D. Ament wrote: > I think there's a bug with how the caching works for podlings.xml, but I'm > not sure if it's something I introduced or something I'm just noticing. > > I would expect that the cache is comparing podlings.json to podlings.xml. > If podlings.json mod