Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread Roy Lenferink
Thanks for the reply Sam! I think I learned another thing today, don't just trust 'docker run hello-world' to verify your docker configuration ;) In the end it was a network problem with Docker on my side and strange enough a reboot solved it. The image is still building but I'll keep this list up

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > I just tried the Docker instructions, however the rake docker:update > command is failing for me with the error shown below. Am I maybe missing > something? [snip] > Err:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease > Tem

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread Matt Sicker
For the /srv checkouts, if you make them volumes, you can override that at runtime to use a bound directory instead of a generic Docker volume (which itself just goes in Docker’s data directory otherwise). Using a volume is important regardless for file system performance on that data. As for keep

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 17:49, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:15 AM sebb wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 13:34, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:17 AM sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:26, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > > docker:update had

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread Roy Lenferink
I just tried the Docker instructions, however the rake docker:update command is failing for me with the error shown below. Am I maybe missing something? I am on CentOS 8.0.1905 with Docker version 19.03.5, build 633a0ea. I also tested using podman with podman-compose (with alias docker='podman' e

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:15 AM sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 13:34, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:17 AM sebb wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:26, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > docker:update had issues pulling down various svn repos, e.g. > > > > > > > > svn:

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 13:34, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:17 AM sebb wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:26, sebb wrote: > > > > > docker:update had issues pulling down various svn repos, e.g. > > > > > > svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL ... > > > svn

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:17 AM sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:26, sebb wrote: > > > docker:update had issues pulling down various svn repos, e.g. > > > > svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL ... > > svn: E125009: Invalid config: unable to load certificate file > > '

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:26, sebb wrote: > docker:update had issues pulling down various svn repos, e.g. > > svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL ... > svn: E125009: Invalid config: unable to load certificate file > '/Users/sebb/.subversion/Thawte_Premium_Server_CA.pem' > > I

Re: Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-19 Thread sebb
docker:update had issues pulling down various svn repos, e.g. svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL ... svn: E125009: Invalid config: unable to load certificate file '/Users/sebb/.subversion/Thawte_Premium_Server_CA.pem' I was able to remove the Invalid config error by changing

Docker beta testers wanted (was: Mac OSX read only file system)

2019-11-18 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:43 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > Maybe a docker image is the way to go. I’ll test it if you point it out. Beta testers wanted: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/master/DOCKER.md - Sam Ruby

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-11-17 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 6:39 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:43 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Maybe a docker image is the way to go. I’ll test it if you point it out. > > A docker image is VERY appealing. There are things that don't work > and/or are hard to do on Mac (for exam

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-11-12 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 9:23 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:19 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > P.S. Not a priority for me at this next week, but it occurs to me that > > newer versions of MAC OS/X may have newer versions of Apache HTTPD, so > > we may no longer need the brew version

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-20 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:19 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > > P.S. Not a priority for me at this next week, but it occurs to me that > newer versions of MAC OS/X may have newer versions of Apache HTTPD, so > we may no longer need the brew version of Apache HTTPD, which these > days require manual patches to

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:05 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > > With the latest update (Catalina): > > $ sudo mkdir /srv > mkdir: /srv: Read-only file system > > Previously, whimsy tools were set up to determine file names based on > a ~/.whimsy config file. Over time, much of this has changed to > presume

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-19 Thread sebb
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 12:01, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 5:00 AM sebb wrote: > > > > Also /srv is actually a link to /x1/srv on Ubuntu, so potentially it > > could be changed in stages? > > There is no /srv directory. There is no /x1 directory. And neither > can be created. Th

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 5:00 AM sebb wrote: > > Also /srv is actually a link to /x1/srv on Ubuntu, so potentially it > could be changed in stages? There is no /srv directory. There is no /x1 directory. And neither can be created. There are two volumes. The root volume is read only. /System/Vo

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:43 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > Maybe a docker image is the way to go. I’ll test it if you point it out. A docker image is VERY appealing. There are things that don't work and/or are hard to do on Mac (for example, setting up Apache httpd with LDAP enabled as brew no long

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-19 Thread sebb
Does /srv contain anything? Or is it an empty directory like /home? If it's empty, then I found out that it's possible to mount a container over it. S. On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 05:44, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Or is chmod your friend? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 18, 2019, at 9:05 PM, Sam R

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-19 Thread sebb
Also /srv is actually a link to /x1/srv on Ubuntu, so potentially it could be changed in stages? On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 09:53, sebb wrote: > > Does /srv contain anything? > > Or is it an empty directory like /home? > > If it's empty, then I found out that it's possible to mount a container over

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-18 Thread Dave Fisher
Or is chmod your friend? Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2019, at 9:05 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > With the latest update (Catalina): > > $ sudo mkdir /srv > mkdir: /srv: Read-only file system > > Previously, whimsy tools were set up to determine file names based on > a ~/.whimsy config file. O

Re: Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-18 Thread Dave Fisher
Catalina did some annoying things. For me emacs was gone as Apple doesn’t like gpl3. There is more security on directories. Maybe a docker image is the way to go. I’ll test it if you point it out. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2019, at 9:05 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > With the latest update (

Mac OSX read only file system

2019-10-18 Thread Sam Ruby
With the latest update (Catalina): $ sudo mkdir /srv mkdir: /srv: Read-only file system Previously, whimsy tools were set up to determine file names based on a ~/.whimsy config file. Over time, much of this has changed to presume /srv. Most problematic: $LOAD_PATH.unshift '/srv/whimsy/lib' No