Re: Auth required for status/passenger

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 17 March 2016 at 13:03, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:59 AM, sebb wrote: >>> The status page says that passenger status is restricted to "ASF >>> committer only", however the code uses the realm "ASF Members and >>> Officers". >>>

Auth required for status/passenger

2016-03-19 Thread sebb
The status page says that passenger status is restricted to "ASF committer only", however the code uses the realm "ASF Members and Officers". Which is correct?

Re: Auth required for status/passenger

2016-03-19 Thread sebb
On 17 March 2016 at 13:03, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:59 AM, sebb wrote: >> The status page says that passenger status is restricted to "ASF >> committer only", however the code uses the realm "ASF Members and >> Officers". >> >> Which is correct? > > At, the moment, the code obv

Re: Auth required for status/passenger

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:59 AM, sebb wrote: > The status page says that passenger status is restricted to "ASF > committer only", however the code uses the realm "ASF Members and > Officers". > > Which is correct? At, the moment, the code obviously. :-) Originally, passenger status was open, a

Re: Auth required for status/passenger

2016-03-18 Thread sebb
On 17 March 2016 at 16:14, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:24 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 17 March 2016 at 13:03, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:59 AM, sebb wrote: The status page says that passenger status is restricted to "ASF committer only", however the code