Re: Individual Contributor License Agreement

> On Aug 25, 2024, at 12:37, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 at 13:36, sebbaz(Test) wrote: > >> The SVN entries are intended for historic purposes to ensure we have a >> copy of the key that was used to sign the document. >> As such, they must not be deleted. >> >> In any case, the SVN

Re: Individual Contributor License Agreement

Just one last thought... > On Aug 25, 2024, at 13:56, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > >> On Aug 25, 2024, at 05:36, sebbaz(Test) > > wrote: >> >> The SVN entries are intended for historic purposes to ensure we have a >> copy of the key that was used to sign th

Re: Individual Contributor License Agreement

Hi Sebb, > On Aug 25, 2024, at 05:36, sebbaz(Test) wrote: > > The SVN entries are intended for historic purposes to ensure we have a > copy of the key that was used to sign the document. > As such, they must not be deleted. I deleted this one because I was trying to refresh it. The key had not

Re: Secretary workbench is down...

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 16:38, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Craig Russell wrote on 8/22/24 10:27 AM: > > I can't get it to talk to me. > > Try again, might work now. The server had an OOM condition that > required several restarts and a data fix, but it seems to mostly be > working now. > > The root is

Re: Individual Contributor License Agreement

On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 at 13:36, sebbaz(Test) wrote: > The SVN entries are intended for historic purposes to ensure we have a > copy of the key that was used to sign the document. > As such, they must not be deleted. > > In any case, the SVN entries are not directly used for validation. > GPG can on

Re: Internal server error during request for new account in secretary workbench

What time did the error occur? What was the document id (URL) you were working on? In future if an error such as this occurs, please take a screenshot. It should be safe to share the URL on a public list, but probably not the screen contents. Sebb

Re: Individual Contributor License Agreement

The SVN entries are intended for historic purposes to ensure we have a copy of the key that was used to sign the document. As such, they must not be deleted. In any case, the SVN entries are not directly used for validation. GPG can only check a key that is in its database. I'm not sure there is