Re: ldap "meta" ou

> On Jun 13, 2022, at 10:57 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:06 PM Chris Lambertus > wrote: >> >>> On Jun 12, 2022, at 4:54 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> If the problem is just that recreating ou=meta is messy, then there >>> are other solutions. >>> >>>

Re: ldap "meta" ou

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:06 PM Chris Lambertus wrote: > > > On Jun 12, 2022, at 4:54 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > If the problem is just that recreating ou=meta is messy, then there > > are other solutions. > > > > For example, it should not be too difficult to compare the lists and > > only update t

Re: E_NO_CARE

> On Jun 12, 2022, at 03:08, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 01:49, Craig Russell > wrote: >> >> While looking at the secretary workbench process to reject a document, there >> was at the same time a document that has no relevance to the job of >> secreta

Re: ldap "meta" ou

> On Jun 12, 2022, at 4:54 PM, sebb wrote: > > If the problem is just that recreating ou=meta is messy, then there > are other solutions. > > For example, it should not be too difficult to compare the lists and > only update those which have changed. > Probably can also speed this up by compa