While looking at the secretary workbench process to reject a document, there
was at the same time a document that has no relevance to the job of secretary.
I'm thinking of adding a new reason to reject a document.
@not_relevant; ' not relevant', ' this document is not relevant to the work of
t
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
I guess it would be possible to compose the list of reasons on the front end
and pass them to the back end to compose the email. There would be a bit more
network traffic because the entire text of the reasons would have to be sent.
I admit I mis
On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 17:44, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Been a while, but helping deal with a newer member setup his first account.
>
> I feel like at one point I could access acreq from the landing page of
> whimsy.a.o. Now to get to it, I need to click on Overview of Useful
> Officer T
On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 at 00:15, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> When parts.js.rb is updated to add more reasons to reject a document, a
> corresponding change must be made to incomplete.json.rb.
>
> Is there an easy way for incomplete.json.rb to somehow pick up the changes,
> perhaps by redefining the s
