Re: Bug in secretary workbench -- additional ICLA when the first ICLA was signed with gpg

2020-12-28 Thread Sam Ruby
Perhaps whimsysvn should be given read access after all? At least temporarily until another approach can be implemented? https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5bfcd501e21a70ec7c6bebbf91995ef06c2a7e347afa9dbaed040b97%40%3Cprivacy.apache.org%3E - Sam Ruby On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:00 PM sebb wr

Re: Bug in secretary workbench -- additional ICLA when the first ICLA was signed with gpg

2020-12-28 Thread sebb
Here is the error from the update job: https://whimsy.apache.org/status/#svn-iclas On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 14:49, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > > On Dec 28, 2020, at 5:05 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > I think that is because the job that updates the cached list of icla > > file names no longer has acces

Re: Bug in secretary workbench -- additional ICLA when the first ICLA was signed with gpg

2020-12-28 Thread Craig Russell
> On Dec 28, 2020, at 5:05 AM, sebb wrote: > > I think that is because the job that updates the cached list of icla > file names no longer has access to the SVN directory to be able to > list the file names. The error occurs after reading the existing ICLA names and details (from iclas.txt a

Re: Bug in secretary workbench -- additional ICLA when the first ICLA was signed with gpg

2020-12-28 Thread sebb
I think that is because the job that updates the cached list of icla file names no longer has access to the SVN directory to be able to list the file names. It might be possible to do away with the cache, and fetch the names on demand. On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 04:41, Craig Russell wrote: > > This s