Re: Mail not visible in secretary workbench

2018-11-05 Thread Sam Ruby
Taking a look at the RFC, my explanation is incorrect. Separators lines are defined as two dashes followed by the separator. Looking closer at the message, it appears that the message separates lines by /n instead of the required /r/n characters. I know that the mail gem has a bit of code to rec

Re: Mail not visible in secretary workbench

2018-11-05 Thread Sam Ruby
The answer I'm about to give is not likely to be very enlightening. That particular message, when parsed by the Ruby mail gem, has no attachments. https://whimsy.apache.org/secretary/workbench/201811/f19c4032c4/ If you look at the raw version of the message, you will see boundary="=_NextPart

Mail not visible in secretary workbench

2018-11-05 Thread Craig Russell
A mail received by secretary@ this morning at 3:28 AM Pacific was not delivered to the workbench. It was forwarded to my apache.clr address. Any ideas what went wrong? Here are the headers: 大步流星 <835576...@qq.com> yizhenqiang-dubbo ICLA To: Secretary Dkim-Signature: ⁨v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=rela

Re: Bug in secretary workbench -- tainted from_addr

2018-11-05 Thread Craig Russell
Can we please take another look at this issue? I'm afraid it might start to affect account creation since no email with the vote result is being sent to root. Thanks, Craig > On Oct 30, 2018, at 8:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:43 PM Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> It would be