Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread sebb
On 27 October 2017 at 22:02, Craig Russell wrote: > >> On Oct 27, 2017, at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote: >> - https://whimsy.apache.org/project/icla/form crashes with: TypeError: Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined >>> >>> What did you do right before the crash? >> >> Nothing; just

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread sebb
On 27 October 2017 at 22:11, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi John, > >> On Oct 27, 2017, at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 27 October 2017 at 14:44, John D. Ament wrote: > I like it. For incubating projects, it would be great if the podling in > question could be selected, so that they can b

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread Craig Russell
Hi John, > On Oct 27, 2017, at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote: > >>> On 27 October 2017 at 14:44, John D. Ament wrote: I like it. For incubating projects, it would be great if the podling in question could be selected, so that they can be automatically added to that podling's roster when d

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread Craig Russell
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote: > >>> - https://whimsy.apache.org/project/icla/form crashes with: >>> >>> TypeError: Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined >> >> What did you do right before the crash? > > Nothing; just navigate to the URL. > What motivated you to navigate to

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread sebb
On 27 October 2017 at 20:49, Craig Russell wrote: > >> On Oct 27, 2017, at 7:37 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> I'm all for automating the process. >> >> However it concerns me that there does not seem to be any provision to >> require either a written signature or a GPG sig for the ICLA itself. >> Or is t

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread Craig Russell
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 7:37 AM, sebb wrote: > > I'm all for automating the process. > > However it concerns me that there does not seem to be any provision to > require either a written signature or a GPG sig for the ICLA itself. > Or is that still part of accepting the ICLA? I've opened a disc

Re: committers: r79717 - /committers/board/committee-info.txt

2017-10-27 Thread John D. Ament
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > Adding Phil to the cc list. > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 27 October 2017 at 01:46, wrote: > >> Author: rubys > >> Date: Fri Oct 27 00:46:42 2017 > >> New Revision: 79717 > >> > >> Log: > >> insert new projects into

Re: committers: r79717 - /committers/board/committee-info.txt

2017-10-27 Thread Sam Ruby
Adding Phil to the cc list. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, sebb wrote: > On 27 October 2017 at 01:46, wrote: >> Author: rubys >> Date: Fri Oct 27 00:46:42 2017 >> New Revision: 79717 >> >> Log: >> insert new projects into the rotation > > Note that new projects are already listed as "new, mo

Re: committers: r79717 - /committers/board/committee-info.txt

2017-10-27 Thread John D. Ament
Also note that the project should be called "Juneau" not "Junea". On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM sebb wrote: > On 27 October 2017 at 01:46, wrote: > > Author: rubys > > Date: Fri Oct 27 00:46:42 2017 > > New Revision: 79717 > > > > Log: > > insert new projects into the rotation > > Note that

[jira] [Created] (WHIMSY-153) Validate names in committee-info.txt

2017-10-27 Thread Sebb (JIRA)
Sebb created WHIMSY-153: --- Summary: Validate names in committee-info.txt Key: WHIMSY-153 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-153 Project: Whimsy Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Sebb

Re: committers: r79717 - /committers/board/committee-info.txt

2017-10-27 Thread sebb
On 27 October 2017 at 01:46, wrote: > Author: rubys > Date: Fri Oct 27 00:46:42 2017 > New Revision: 79717 > > Log: > insert new projects into the rotation Note that new projects are already listed as "new, monthly through xxx" at the end of section 2. In the case of Kibble and Juneau, they are

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread sebb
I'm all for automating the process. However it concerns me that there does not seem to be any provision to require either a written signature or a GPG sig for the ICLA itself. Or is that still part of accepting the ICLA? Are there any security issues if the random token is published? What functio

Re: New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread John D. Ament
I like it. For incubating projects, it would be great if the podling in question could be selected, so that they can be automatically added to that podling's roster when done. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:36 AM Craig Russell wrote: > I'd like to share the results of the informal Whimsy hackathon t

New ICLA process

2017-10-27 Thread Craig Russell
I'd like to share the results of the informal Whimsy hackathon that was held in Raleigh after ATO. Attendees: Craig and Sam. Feedback welcome. Using the existing demo ICLA process, here is what we're thinking for the new process for a PMC to invite a contributor or newly-elected proposed commit