Re: committers: r66267 - /committers/board/committee-info.txt

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 5:51 PM, sebb wrote: > On 6 March 2016 at 01:38, wrote: >> Author: rubys >> Date: Sun Mar 6 01:38:39 2016 >> New Revision: 66267 >> >> Log: >> whimsy += humbedooh >> >> Modified: >> committers/board/committee-info.txt >> >> Modified: committers/board/committee-info.tx

Re: /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 => /usr/bin/ruby

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 6:19 PM, sebb wrote: > About half the ruby script files use /usr/bin/ruby and the others use > /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 > > I'm not sure it makes sense to force the use of a specific ruby > version in this way. > > Would it not be better to omit the version suffix, and document th

/usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 => /usr/bin/ruby

About half the ruby script files use /usr/bin/ruby and the others use /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 I'm not sure it makes sense to force the use of a specific ruby version in this way. Would it not be better to omit the version suffix, and document the required ruby version(s) elsewhere?

Re: committers: r66267 - /committers/board/committee-info.txt

On 6 March 2016 at 01:38, wrote: > Author: rubys > Date: Sun Mar 6 01:38:39 2016 > New Revision: 66267 > > Log: > whimsy += humbedooh > > Modified: > committers/board/committee-info.txt > > Modified: committers/board/committee-info.txt > ==