## Introduction
[TVM Object
system]([https://tvm.apache.org/docs/dev/runtime.html#tvm-object-and-compiler-stack](https://tvm.apache.org/docs/dev/runtime.html#tvm-object-and-compiler-stack))
provides a convenient and decent way to share objects between backend (C++)
and frontend (Python/Java/R
Hi @comaniac,
[quote="comaniac, post:2, topic:7930"]
* Are the generated .h and .cc files supposed to be tracked in the repo, or
they are more like the build files?
[/quote]
They will be tracked in the repo. But user should write the tschema for objects
instead of writing the cpp files direct
Hi @jcf94,
[quote="jcf94, post:5, topic:7930"]
IMHO, advanced users who may benefit from it are more likely to write their C++
code directly, while other users may not really have a requirement on this.
[/quote]
First, this is not only for C++ code generation. In the future, we will extend
it
@zhiics Yep, we have an option to turn off the default method generation and
allow user to fill their customized code snippets.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvm-object-schema-dsl/7930/8) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
Hi @mwillsey,
The decentralizing code generation sounds a good idea technically! We choose
Python mainly for user-friendly. I would also like to know @tqchen's opinion
here.
[quote="mwillsey, post:9, topic:7930"]
On the topic of checking the generated code in, I’m not sure why that is
necessa
Nice work @spectrometerHBH!
I would like to give it a try! One question, how can I build the `tir.function`
after I define it with the script? Is the path has been pushed on master branch
now?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-hybrid-script-support-for-tir/7516/21)
Great suggestion!
Can we make it as a nightly/weekly regression test utils and also consider
adding accuracy evaluation for quantization model into this loop?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-building-a-new-reproducible-benchmark-for-tvm/8496/2)
to respond.
You are
I vote for A0 for consistency with DLDataType / tvm::DataType
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-rename-tvmcontext-to-tvmdevice/9090/23)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://d
Sounds like a good case for https://github.com/tlc-pack/relax/issues/46
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/tvm-integration-with-external-dsp-accelerator-api/11641/3)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails
I agree that the existing approach does not work well and support this RFC :+1:
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/6)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https
Please join us to welcome @denise-k as a new reviewer to TVM.
Denise is the main (co)authors of roadmap RFC and roadmap process:
- https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/31
- https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/50
- https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pre-rfc-tvm-roadmap/11171
And she helps t
11 matches
Mail list logo
