This looks good to me--addressing the comment from @leandron, I'll also be
doing work in the coming weeks to open-source the CI components of the tvm-ci,
packer, and terraform repositories, at which point it should be fairly easy for
others to make contributions to the CI/contribute machines to
It seems not impossible to me, since `ExternOp` doesn't even have a schedule
but simply calls an "extern" implementation such as CuBLAS.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/autoscheduler-do-we-have-plan-to-support-auto-schedule-externop/10346/11)
to respond.
You are receiv
Hi, All
If I want to use BYOC for a new operator, should I skip the Step 4-5 in this
tutorial https://tvm.apache.org/docs/dev/how_to/relay_add_op.html?
Thanks!
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/byoc-codegen-for-customized-call-node-operator/11863/1)
to respond.
You are
Yes, if you don't intend to compile your model with native tvm, you only need
relay op so can skip that steps.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/byoc-codegen-for-customized-call-node-operator/11863/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mo
I just encounter a problem that
```
Check failed: (!actual_type.defined()) is false: Expected type PrimExpr but got
relay.Var
```
Even though my new operator defined with
```
Expr MakeFun(Expr X1, Expr X2, Expr X3, DataType out_dtype)
```
My type relation function is written as
```
bool Fu
this problem solved due to mismatched `set_body_typed(MakeFun)` and the actual
`MakeFun`
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/byoc-codegen-for-customized-call-node-operator/11863/4)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe fr
Now I counter another problem
```
nn.func doesn't have an FTVMStrategy registered. You can register one in python
with `tvm.relay.op.register_strategy`.
```
Should I put some dummy strategy for this operator even if I use BYOC?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/byoc-codege
