[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [pre-RFC] Process RFCs

[quote="areusch, post:1, topic:11710"] * Is this process a reasonable burden to add to the community? * Are the voting process and comment periods reasonable? [/quote] I think both process burden and the proposed timelines to get it done are adequate. I'm fully supportive of what is proposed he

Re: [apache/tvm] [pre-RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #9730)

Hello @jroesch, We have followed the tvm-RFC steps; and we have converted contents in our pre-RFC posting into a RFC one, plus, added more required sub sections as explained by the RFC template format. Please see a copy below. We will find time to upload our RFC to the GitHub repo https://githu

[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #48)

* Integrate Marvell’s ML/AI accelerator with TVM BYOC framework in order to bring the TVM ecosystem to Marvell customers. We have also posted a pre-RFC at https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pre-rfc-byoc-marvell-ml-ai-accelerator-integration/11691. Plus, we have up-streamed our POC code changes in:

Re: [apache/tvm] [pre-RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #9730)

Hi @jroesch, We have filed a RFC PR-48 (RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration) at the TVM GitHub https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs repo. Thanks, - Joe -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9730#issuecomment-997046258 You are rece