[TVM Discuss] [Development] Pass sparse tensor to tvm.build

>From the [discussion about running sparse >CNNs](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/running-a-cnn-using-sparsity-convertor/7267/11), > I have implemented prototypes of a dense NCHW GEMM convolution, and what I >think is a working CSR NCHW GEMM convolution. I will share the code once it's a bit more mat

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Apache TVM Graduation (#6332)

Thanks everyone. The results are: +1 Markus Junru ziheng Thierry Henry Lily Jared Haichen Masa Morita Wuwei Siju Gon Timothy Chenfan Siva  Furkan +0 None -1 None The vote has passed. We will now proceed with a followup vote in IPMC. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply t

[apache/incubator-tvm] [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Graduation (#6350)

Thanks everyone who voted. Voting thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd5b8eefe49af09a2d0913758a5e5737b3fdb9072bc0becf4a2b2c7ee%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E The results are: +1 Markus Junru ziheng Thierry Henry Lily Jared Haichen Masa Morita Wuwei Siju Gon Timothy Chenfan Siva  Furkan

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] SaveToFile(file_name, format) expected behavior

In the context of the [command-line driver PR](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/6302), it was possible to notice some issues in the way different `ModuleNode` subclasses - such as `ONNXSourceModuleNode`, `StackVMModuleNode`, `LLVMModuleNode`, etc. - behave, with regards to `SaveTo

Test to see if podling is listening

This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tvm.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tvm.

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] SaveToFile(file_name, format) expected behavior

Also cc @zhiics for comments. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-savetofile-file-name-format-expected-behavior/7741/2) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubs

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

ACK > On Aug 27, 2020, at 10:37 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

. On 28 Aug 2020 Fri at 00:10 Sheng Zha wrote: > ACK > > > > > On Aug 27, 2020, at 10:37 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > > > > > --

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC][µTVM] µTVM RPC Server

See [µTVM RPC Server Draft PR](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/6334). ## Motivation The µTVM project can be thought of in two logical components that work together to execute models on device: 1. A compiler that transforms Relay functions into a set of fused Relay operators, an

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Composite Target

This is a follow-up RFC from https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-tvm-target-specification/6844 This RFC is discussed with @junrushao1994. In this RFC, we propose the way to represent a composite target. The motivation is that now we have multiple codegens contributed by the community members via BY

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack. On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack:) TQ On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:05 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Ack. > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > > > -

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:09 PM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Ack:) > > TQ > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:05 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > > > Ack. > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the > dev@tvm > > > maili

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack > On Aug 27, 2020, at 4:36 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > > Ack > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:09 PM Tianqi Chen > wrote: > >> Ack:) >> >> TQ >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:05 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: >> >>> Ack. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >>> This is

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:38 PM Thierry Moreau wrote: > Ack > > > > > On Aug 27, 2020, at 4:36 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > > > > > > Ack > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:09 PM Tianqi Chen > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Ack:) > > >> > > >> TQ > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:05 PM Byung-G

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack - Ziheng On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 17:18 Haichen Shen wrote: > Ack > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:38 PM Thierry Moreau > > wrote: > > > > > Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 2020, at 4:36 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Hear ya On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:37 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Composite Target

I would prefer P2, which provides clear separation of host (or fallback) target, as well as composability that keeps invariant when more targets are added --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-composite-target/7744/2) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Composite Target

I agree P2 is better. However, we need to be mindful that the composite can go beyond single accelerator settings. For example, we might also want to compose `arm_cl` and opencl on ARM GPU --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-composite-target/7744/3) to respond. You are receivin

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

ACK On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Hear ya > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:37 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > > >

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack On Thu, Aug 27 2020 at 8:31 PM, Zhi Chen < csw...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > ACK > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Henry Saputra > wrote: > > >> >> >> Hear ya >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:37 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> > > > > > > >

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

test On 2020/08/27 17:36:56, Dave Fisher wrote: > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Composite Target

Glad to see this is proposed since we wanted to do it for a while. I also agree that P2 is better. Another use case of it is heterogeneous execution where we can have llvm and cuda targets in it. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-composite-target/7744/4) to respond. You are r

[TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] SaveToFile(file_name, format) expected behavior

I think another situation where `SaveToFile` is hard is when we have multiple modules imported. For example, a `MetadataModule` could contain a DSOModule and one or more CSourceModule/JSONRuntimeModule. It seems a bit hard to save them out as one file for compilation though. I think this is n

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

ack On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:07 PM Bing Xu wrote: > test > > On 2020/08/27 17:36:56, Dave Fisher wrote: > > This is a test message to see if the project is listening on the dev@tvm > mailing list or is treating this only as an archive. > > > > --