> @FrozenGene can we follow up on this?
Hi, @tqchen I will start to work on it from next Monday! Sorry for working on
it lately because of other things.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apa
Thanks @hjiang for the comments.
[quote="hjiang, post:6, topic:6676"]
#1 about “cloud device may use PCIE instead of memory share”, that make sense,
but seems like a new driver with pcie support would can fix and no need such
big change,
[/quote]
#1 a new driver with PCIe support is not enou
Thanks for the RFC. This really is a way forward for TVM CodeGen as i perceive.
:+1:
I have few points to share as below:
P0: I believe we can merge these two as < TAG > + < ID > . Also it would be
good to use numeric rather than target name in ID.
P1: I could not understand clearly the purp
Does it mean we will have a set of predefined tag names so that user can
directly refer to specific hardware platform, instead of having to setup
architecture details such as "mcpu"? This can make it a lot easier for tvm
beginners.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-tvm-target
Yes, that is the goal
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-tvm-target-specification/6844/7) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/92fdc179b4ceb41ab37b8b7c
