@thierry I have accelerated the 42-layer convolution on vta. I choose
faster_rcnn_resnet50_v1b_voc mxnet model which has 56-layer convolution. I am
going to work with my partner to do some optimization @c
---
[Vi
Merged #5482 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5482#event-3289924118
@hht, would you mind share your implementation of RNN to VTA?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/vta-a-workaround-for-deploying-faster-r-cnn-on-target-ext-dev-vta-and-arm-cpu/6516/7)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from the
Maybe take the next steps ?
1. Do a flag day clang-format rewrite and take the one time cost for every
patch having a merge conflict ?
2. Once we are clang-format clean, we could have CI run clang-format and fail
CI instantly if there is any change in the source base compared to the pull
r
I will investigate around the next two available weekends(when impact to the CI
will be lower)
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/ci-lint-enabling-clang-format-based-lint-checks/6170/8)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from
Looks like we should proceed with the refactor. I opened
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5490 to track this
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-conversion-from-std-string-to-tvm-string/6453/5)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list
@maheshambule seems we have reached concensus, please feel free to update the
PR to reflect the discussion, we only need to support the conversion but not
the runtime part
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-to-onnx/6101/19) to respond.
You are receiving this because you
Would clang-format replace cpplint, or would we have both?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/ci-lint-enabling-clang-format-based-lint-checks/6170/9)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://
I think the cpplint is quite fast, so it won't hurt to have both, as long as
they do not conflict
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/ci-lint-enabling-clang-format-based-lint-checks/6170/10)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe
Thank you for the proposal! I think it is a great idea to have clang-format in
the CI system to enforce coding styles. A quick question, shall we consider
clang-tidy some day in the future?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/ci-lint-enabling-clang-format-based-lint-checks/6170/11)
This is a good suggestion. If you find any bug fixes missing in our monthly dev
report, also feel free to point out, this would help realize the work in our
release notes later.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-improve-pull-requests-with-respect-to-bug-fixes/6529/3)
to resp
clang-tidy certainly looks interesting as well as something deeper than
clang-format and that is likely to help us with other aspects that we may be
missing. However I'm probably a bit old-school and would probably be a bit more
careful about clang-tidy -fix ... :)
That might be the next ste
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1io_uQjG9am5mYbFQ-c7h9nH07fYLmVnq
Here is my project including .so files. You can unzip it and run the
fasterRCNN_vta.py directly with fsim for vta. I didn't make a git commit
because there are some compatibility problems in my code. You can use git
status to
13 matches
Mail list logo
