@yangjunpro +1 on your work. As Relay is also planning to support dynamic
shape(https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/3042), we might not need to directly
handle step 5(relay does the JIT/bucketing under the hood). We are also
thinking that is it reasonable to do the opposite, the main runtime is t
Out of curiosity, what will be the difference between upstreamed r-s-s and
fortanix sgx? The Rust `libstd` implementation is already preferable to the
hugely complex and large TCB Intel C/C++ libs. Are you innovating on the runner?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this th
I think for now it is okay to just support code gen with fully symbolic shape.
Later if we want specific optimization strategies for different programs, we
can revisit and adding more code gen strategies.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email d
