Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][DISCUSS] Python3 Timeline of 2019 (#2715)

2019-03-19 Thread Tianqi Chen
Seems we are converging toward drop python2 in 0.6 the cycle, in terms of versions perhaps we can start by requiring 3.5 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2715#issuecomment-47

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][Relay] Implicit type casting vs explicit dtype conversion (#2659)

2019-03-19 Thread Tianqi Chen
I guess the conclusion, for now, is to keep things as it is and use explicit casting -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2659#issuecomment-474676465

[TVM Discuss] [Development] [Tensor Expression] add hardware specific schedule

2019-03-19 Thread tqchen via TVM Discuss
I am not sure if we could summarize a global machine IR, but we do intend to make VTA a class of accelerators so TVM stack can be used to target any accelerators people might built. @thierry might has more thoughts on this --- [Visit Topic](http://tracking.discuss.tvm.ai/tracking/click?d=

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][Relay] Implicit type casting vs explicit dtype conversion (#2659)

2019-03-19 Thread Haichen Shen
Closed #2659. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2659#event-2215789315

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][Relay] Implicit type casting vs explicit dtype conversion (#2659)

2019-03-19 Thread Haichen Shen
Yes, I agree that we should just keep the explicit casting. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2659#issuecomment-474697807