I agree, we could shoot an error in the strict mode to forbid pure object
construction
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/attrs-not-inheriting-from-attrs/7029/4)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
he
Thank you.
I filed [PR 5853](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5853).
To put in some long term perspective: I wonder whether one could somehow
systematically see if things of class Object rather than a subclass are
instantiated and not allow that.
Best regards
Thomas
---
[Vis
I agree that it is good to add those attrs to the python side so that they maps
to Attrs
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/attrs-not-inheriting-from-attrs/7029/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
I noticed that while most Attrs inherit from Attrs, some don't and are only on
the C++ side (thus being mapped to Object). In particular, they don't have the
`keys` function.
Now defining them with a short docstring like the others is easy, but is that
an OK patch?
Best regards
Thomas
The o
