To move this forward, I spent some time over the past few days to get both
TF1.15 and TF2.x testing with our CI and ran into a few issues.
See
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5392
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5391
regards
Ramana
---
[Visit
Topic](https:/
> Due to recent situation and the current progress, we might expect a bit of
> delay in the release to June/July -- we expect the unified IR refactor to
> land by then. We will do our best to keep the timeframe.
Including more operator should be scheduled as least for one frontend? Onnx or
tens
Move to #4647
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4617#issuecomment-616779767
Closed #4617.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4617#event-3253380712
There has been quite a few places where the name util/utils has been used to
indicate common utility functions. From a design perspective, the name "util"
should be avoided when possible. Instead we should think about whether we can
have an explicit module name or add a more informative prefix
Approach 1 does not mean no changes to TVM at all. At least we have to add an
option to turn off the initialize-reduction-buffer-to-zero procedure.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-implement-add-to-semantic-in-tvm/3618/19)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enab
@maheshambule I am very glad we can make some positive contributions to TVM. If
you require any further information, feel free to contact me.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-to-onnx/6101/16) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To
