Re: [trafficserver] branch master updated (f8718b7 -> 43e0be5)

2016-08-24 Thread James Peach
I'm having second thoughts about this. There's currently no replacement for the SWR plugin so I think we should leave it in the build until there is. > On Aug 24, 2016, at 7:47 AM, sor...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > sorber pushe

Re: [trafficserver] branch master updated (f8718b7 -> 43e0be5)

2016-08-24 Thread Phil Sorber
You mean just undo the removal from plugins/experimental/Makefile.am? On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:31 AM James Peach wrote: > I'm having second thoughts about this. There's currently no replacement > for the SWR plugin so I think we should leave it in the build until there > is. > > > > On Aug 24,

Re: [trafficserver] branch master updated (f8718b7 -> 43e0be5)

2016-08-24 Thread James Peach
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Phil Sorber wrote: > > You mean just undo the removal from plugins/experimental/Makefile.am? Yep. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:31 AM James Peach wrote: > >> I'm having second thoughts about this. There's currently no replacement >> for the SWR plugin so I thi

Re: [trafficserver] branch master updated (f8718b7 -> 43e0be5)

2016-08-24 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:31 AM, James Peach wrote: > > I'm having second thoughts about this. There's currently no replacement for > the SWR plugin so I think we should leave it in the build until there is. > Is this related to the Jira you filed re: the new fail-action = 2 not working? Any

Re: [trafficserver] branch master updated (f8718b7 -> 43e0be5)

2016-08-24 Thread James Peach
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:31 AM, James Peach wrote: >> >> I'm having second thoughts about this. There's currently no replacement for >> the SWR plugin so I think we should leave it in the build until there is. >> > > > Is this relat