GitHub user masaori335 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/525
TS-3535: Experimental Support of Stream Priority Feature in HTTP/2
[TS-3535](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3535) Experimental
Support of Stream Priority Feature.
## App
Hi,
The " Not Found on Accelerator " and "Multi-Hop Cycle" logs seem indicate that
ATS itself is acting as parent/origin for some urls, maybe you should take a
deeper look at your config files.
-Original Message-
From: Dk Jack [mailto:dnj0...@gmail.com]
Sent: lunedì 14 marzo 2016 20:
Github user jrushf1239k commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/504#issuecomment-196839635
Yup, it's been tested.
Thanks
--
John J. Rushford
IPCDN Engineering
1400 Wewatta Street, Denver Colorado 80202
john_rushf...@cable.
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/525#issuecomment-196868807
Seeing that there are some pretty serious issues, should we leave it
disabled for now, with a records.config option to enable it?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/525#issuecomment-196875583
@zwoop see ``proxy.config.http2.stream_priority_enabled``?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
GitHub user jacksontj opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526
Fix for TS-4276
In the event that `lookup_done` returns a NULL, we'll reschedule the lookup
in the future instead of dumping core.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-196904843
I'm not sure this is the correct fix, in this case where we have no space
we probably should just get lookup_done to return a non-persistant version of
the reco
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-196907474
This is a different patch to the same issue. Instead of scheduling it for a
retry, we can just return the non-mmaped HostDBInfo we have, so everything else
can
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-196921878
As I'm thinking through this some more, I'm not certain this is a great
solution either. The particular case that I reproduced was that hostdb was full
when ret
Thanks. I think after cleaning up the config and reloading everything,
things seem to be working fine with the custom plugin.
Thanks everyone for the help.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Luca Rea
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The " Not Found on Accelerator " and "Multi-Hop Cycle" logs seem indicate
> that
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/525#issuecomment-196971215
Perfect!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-196975636
Maybe it needs to evict things more aggressively, such that it always has
~10% head room for these sort of events ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-197011767
I don't think we can ever gaurantee that there will always be space
available, and since we already evict when we need space, we should just keep
doing that IMO
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-197047822
Not sure I understand. I'm saying, evict before it gets full, so normal
eviction happens when there's 10% of less available, before inserting new
stuff. That gives
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/526#issuecomment-197055859
From what I'm seeing 1) should be completely doable-- I'll take a crack at
it :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
15 matches
Mail list logo
