Hi all,
Just grabbed the source & wanted to use Vagrant to try it out without modifying
my development machine. Then I noticed there’s already a Vagrantfile present,
and it seems to do what I want (mounts the trafficserver source in the VM). But
when I do a ‘vagrant up’ I get a lot of errors ab
Guests additions are specific to Vagrant/Virtualbox, not to ATS. I use it
for testing, but don't use the provided Vagrantfile.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Michael Herstine <
mherst...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just grabbed the source & wanted to use Vagrant to try it out wit
Anyone recognize these three new Coverity errors as part of their recent (~24h)
commits?
— Leif
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: January 23, 2015 at 2:59:10 AM MST
> From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
> To: zw...@apache.org
> Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache Traffic Ser
I've touched HttpTransact.cc in the past 24 hours, but didn't change
anything that would obviously trigger these new warnings.
Looks like we should be null checking the results of find_field, but
that logic doesn't seem to have changed. So don't know why coverity is
complaining now.
On 1/23
Hi all,
We’re pleased to announce our next ATS Summit! It’ll be held adjacent to the
2015 ApacheCon North America Conference, Thursday - Friday April 16-17th. In
addition, we’ll do an informal Hackathon on Sunday April 12th, and possibly
Saturday April 18th. Details on the Summit is still being
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-71288426
@bgaff I squashed all of the commits into one. I've also changed it from
traffic_cop to traffic_server while we wait for @jpeach 's commit to land.
---
If your
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-71289722
A point @bgaff brought up was that tsqa (the harness/framework) lives
outside this source tree. This is intentional as the *tests* are tied to the
trafficserver
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-71289896
Also, do we need the Apache file headers on all test cases as well?
(@zwoop would probably be the one to answer)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-71293965
Yes.
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Thomas Jackson
wrote:
>
> Also, do we need the Apache file headers on all test cases as well?
(@zwoo
Github user bretep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-71299489
@jacksontj how about adding it as a git submodule?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-71299904
Not sure why you would prefer not to just merge it in, but I can with 99%
certainty say that we would not include it as a git submodule. We would
consider it as a gi
Github user bretep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-7124
@zwoop I can get behind that. I'd much rather have it merged myself.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
12 matches
Mail list logo
