GitHub user hopkings2008 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/164
[TS-3235] fix crash problem caused by sync problem in PluginVC.
This fix is for the multi-thread sync problem exists in PluginVC of TS-3235.
Below is the scenario of this problem:
I plan on rolling a 4.2.3 release here in the next 24 hours or so. I wanted
to make sure there was nothing else anyone wanted to see backported before
I did that. Here is the current list of backports for 4.2.3:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3304?jql=project%20%3D%20TS%20AND%20%22Backpo
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First, thanks to James, Thomas, Josh and everyone for taking these
> initiatives with tsqa. It's great. I'd like to make sure we don't forget the
> existing regression infrastructure.
> Many times, it's IMO preferable and easier
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First, thanks to James, Thomas, Josh and everyone for taking these
>> initiatives with tsqa. It's great. I'd like to make sure we don't forget the
>> existing regres
I wonder if it was meant to be "e->hits >>= 1;" - that would almost make sense
with the comment.
Tuesday, January 20, 2015, 10:00:40 PM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a question about the tick function of RamCacheCLFUS, the code is :
> ..
e->>hits <<= 1;
if (e->>hits) {
>e->hits = REQU
Hi,
That's exactly what i thought. But even if using ">>=" instead of "<<=", there
still seems to be some inconsistency with the comment ( According to the
implementation of REQUEUE_HITS, the "hits" will be set to 1 if the number is
greater than 1, otherwise it will be set to 0)
I'm not sure i