Count me in.
-- Meera
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> Thomas and Josh have made some pretty good progress on a testing framework,
> I think it's probably time for another mini meetup to see where we're at
> and get everyone caught up. Would anyone be interested
Hello,
I noticed that hook TS_HTTP_TXN_START_HOOK is called after activating
SSL blind tunnel. Inside that hook I create a continuation for
TS_HTTP_OS_DNS_HOOK, which is also called with url like tunnel://:443.
I have a few questions regarding this behavior:
1) Is it ok that TXN_START is called
The TXN_START should not be called in the SSL blind tunnel case. I'm
seeing this as well. It looks like the protocol trampoline logic isn't
detecting that we have decided to blind tunnel the content and continues
on with the protocol detection. Definitely not a good thing.
I'm tracking it d
I've dug into Lev's observation on the Transaction Start hook and blind
tunnels some more. I'd like to pursue two issues so I'm dividing his
note into two.
As the code currently stands, both TS_HTTP_TXN_START_HOOK and
TS_HTTP_SSN_START_HOOK get called at the start of the session.
TS_HTTP_SSN
Lev noted in his experiments with blind tunneling SSL and transaction
start hooks, that the plugin API has no way to test whether a VC is
blind tunneled or not. That seems like a useful tool to the API writer.
There are several ways this could be added to the API.
Most straightforward, we cou
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Susan Hinrichs
> wrote:
>
> Lev noted in his experiments with blind tunneling SSL and transaction start
> hooks, that the plugin API has no way to test whether a VC is blind tunneled
> or not. That seems like a useful tool to the API writer.
>
> There are seve
All, please vote on date/times at the following doodle:
http://doodle.com/t3vss2zdz6wyhez9 , I'll send out an email with the final
details tomorrow afternoon based on everyone's availability.
Brian
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Meera Nataraja wrote:
> Count me in.
>
> -- Meera
>
>
> > On Ja
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/163#issuecomment-70197110
And before we merge this I can squash if we want a cleaner commit log :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Has anyone used redirection_enabled recently (in the last couple
years?). I'm debugging an ink_release_assert reported by someone
running in production. But when I run even the most basic 301 through
it in debug mode, I get ink_asserts in HttpSM::state_cache_open_read().
It is checking that
looks like a very critical problem for me, should we take a look at this?
- Yongming Zhao 赵永明
> 在 2015年1月16日，上午9:45，jenk...@ci.trafficserver.apache.org 写道：
>
> Regression test(SDK_API_HttpTxnTransform) still in progress
> [SDK_API_HttpTxnTransform] TSTransformCreate : [TestCase1] <> { ok }
> [SD
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:24 PM, Yongming Zhao wrote:
>
> looks like a very critical problem for me, should we take a look at this?
Yes, it fails intermittently, and always seems to be on the SPDY builds only.
— leif
>
> - Yongming Zhao 赵永明
>
>> 在 2015年1月16日，上午9:45，jenk...@ci.trafficserver.a
11 matches
Mail list logo
