On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> Asked about this in IRC, but wanted to bring it to the list. For
> experimental plugins, do we need to abide by the backward compatibility
> rule in a stable release? Same question probably applies to
> ts/experimental.h.
>
> My opinion at first
experimental is experimental. No restrictions. Innovation comes more
cheaply when breaking the rules and not complying :-)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>
> > Asked about this in IRC, but wanted to bring it to the list
On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> Asked about this in IRC, but wanted to bring it to the list. For
> experimental plugins, do we need to abide by the backward compatibility
> rule in a stable release? Same question probably applies to
> ts/experimental.h.
>
> My opinion at first
Asked about this in IRC, but wanted to bring it to the list. For
experimental plugins, do we need to abide by the backward compatibility
rule in a stable release? Same question probably applies to
ts/experimental.h.
My opinion at first was no. It's experimental, duh! But the more I think
about it,
