Re: Vol <-> CPU hash mapping, good or bad idea?

2011-12-06 Thread John Plevyak
Just curious. What evidence do we have that that mutex us a problem? On Dec 5, 2011 7:24 PM, "ming@gmail.com" wrote: > we know that Vol locking is the most expensive lock in cache layer, will > we bind Vol and CPU(or thread) a good idea? > > > -- > zym, Zhao Yongming. > aka: yonghao @ taobao

RE: Using ATS configuration framework

2011-12-06 Thread Cooper, Bianca
Hi, I've answered your question inline and there is something else I would like to consult with you. I've added wrapper functions for RecRegisterConfigString and RecRegisterConfigInt functions, which if I understand correctly define the type of the parameter and its default value (among other

TS-857, TS-934, TS-1031

2011-12-06 Thread Alan M. Carroll
The problem with all of these is that locking for the VConnections is done poorly, if at all, and closing a VConnection and de-allocating are conflated. Changing that is hard, though. My current plan is related set of changes 1) Use a smart pointer (based on lib/ts/Ptr.h) instead of raw pointer

Re: svn commit: r1210574 - /trafficserver/traffic/branches/3.0.x/STATUS

2011-12-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > Author: zwoop > Date: Mon Dec 5 19:02:28 2011 > New Revision: 1210574 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210574&view=rev > Log: > Added TS-1037. > > Modified: > trafficserver/traffic/branches/3.0.x/STATUS > > Modified: trafficserver/traffic/branches/3.0