Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-10-10 Thread Igor Galić
Hey folks! The latest iteration of our scan-build is now built with --enable-experimental-plugins so we're getting *more* "bugs" http://people.apache.org/~igalic/checks/ats/latest/ So long, i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-16 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > http://people.apache.org/~igalic/checks/2012-09-13-2/ > > > > built without -stats, but yeah, we're down to 205 bugs > > This resource has moved to: > > http://people.apache.org/~igalic/checks/ats/latest/ > > Soon to come: MOAR CHECKS! Built with: http://sprunge.

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-14 Thread Igor Galić
> http://people.apache.org/~igalic/checks/2012-09-13-2/ > > built without -stats, but yeah, we're down to 205 bugs This resource has moved to: http://people.apache.org/~igalic/checks/ats/latest/ Soon to come: MOAR CHECKS! o/~ i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainswa

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-13 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On Sep 13, 2012, at 6:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On 9/13/12 6:01 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > >> > >> This looks like dead code, it's only called in Config_User_* and > >> that > >> itself is never referenced anywhere. If no one disagrees I'll > >> remove this "A

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-13 Thread James Peach
On Sep 13, 2012, at 6:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 9/13/12 6:01 AM, Igor Galić wrote: >> >> This looks like dead code, it's only called in Config_User_* and that >> itself is never referenced anywhere. If no one disagrees I'll remove this >> "API". >> > > > Should we file bugs for the le

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-13 Thread Igor Galić
> Should we file bugs for the legitimate bugs? And I agree with James, +1 i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-13 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 9/13/12 6:01 AM, Igor Galić wrote: This looks like dead code, it's only called in Config_User_* and that itself is never referenced anywhere. If no one disagrees I'll remove this "API". Should we file bugs for the legitimate bugs? And I agree with James, it'd be nice to get it to underst

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-13 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > > - Original Message - > > Hi all, > > > > I quickly ran the latest clang static analyzer from > > . To > > get it to run, I had to use the -k option, ie: > > > > fish:trafficserver.git jpe

Re: quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-13 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > Hi all, > > I quickly ran the latest clang static analyzer from > . To > get it to run, I had to use the -k option, ie: > > fish:trafficserver.git jpeach$ ../checker-268/scan-build -o > /tmp/ats-

quick clang static analyser results

2012-09-12 Thread James Peach
Hi all, I quickly ran the latest clang static analyzer from . To get it to run, I had to use the -k option, ie: fish:trafficserver.git jpeach$ ../checker-268/scan-build -o /tmp/ats-checker -stats -k make -j4 There's a lot of