Re: nuke all WIN32 dead codes

2012-05-10 Thread ming....@gmail.com
patch submitted on TS-672, I think that is safe to commit it at any time, there is nothing we need to test as all lines removed is just #ifdef out. 在 2012-05-10四的 14:57 +,Igor Galić写道: > > - Original Message - > > AFAIK, we do not have any plan on supporting WIN32, and some of the >

Re: nuke all WIN32 dead codes

2012-05-10 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > AFAIK, we do not have any plan on supporting WIN32, and some of the > codes for WIN32 platform is deleted in the past, but we have many > random > pieces still in the core. should we nuke them out completely? It > would > be a good point as we are going to do a V3.2

Re: nuke all WIN32 dead codes

2012-05-09 Thread James Peach
On May 9, 2012, at 9:12 AM, James Peach wrote: > On May 9, 2012, at 2:38 AM, ming@gmail.com wrote: > >> AFAIK, we do not have any plan on supporting WIN32, and some of the >> codes for WIN32 platform is deleted in the past, but we have many random >> pieces still in the core. should we nuke t

Re: nuke all WIN32 dead codes

2012-05-09 Thread James Peach
On May 9, 2012, at 2:38 AM, ming@gmail.com wrote: > AFAIK, we do not have any plan on supporting WIN32, and some of the > codes for WIN32 platform is deleted in the past, but we have many random > pieces still in the core. should we nuke them out completely? It would > be a good point as we ar

nuke all WIN32 dead codes

2012-05-09 Thread ming....@gmail.com
AFAIK, we do not have any plan on supporting WIN32, and some of the codes for WIN32 platform is deleted in the past, but we have many random pieces still in the core. should we nuke them out completely? It would be a good point as we are going to do a V3.2 release. +1 from me thanks -- zym, Zha