Re: adding a auto tools dependency on pkg-config

2012-07-15 Thread James Peach
On 15/07/2012, at 1:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: > It would be nice to allow for configure flags to be available to compensate > for its absence. By dependency, do you mean that every library would had to > deliver the pkg-config support bits? No, I just wanted to use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to tes

Re: adding a auto tools dependency on pkg-config

2012-07-15 Thread James Peach
On 14/07/2012, at 9:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 7/13/12 11:15 PM, James Peach wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Any objection to me adding a autotools-time dependency on pkg-config? I want >> to use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to test for luajit ... >> > > > What are the implications? What version(s) of au

Re: adding a auto tools dependency on pkg-config

2012-07-15 Thread Theo Schlossnagle
It would be nice to allow for configure flags to be available to compensate for its absence. By dependency, do you mean that every library would had to deliver the pkg-config support bits? On Jul 14, 2012 1:15 AM, "James Peach" wrote: > Hi all, > > Any objection to me adding a autotools-time depe

Re: adding a auto tools dependency on pkg-config

2012-07-14 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 7/13/12 11:15 PM, James Peach wrote: Hi all, Any objection to me adding a autotools-time dependency on pkg-config? I want to use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to test for luajit ... What are the implications? What version(s) of autotools do we need? We can probably stop supporting RHEL4 after v3.4,

adding a auto tools dependency on pkg-config

2012-07-13 Thread James Peach
Hi all, Any objection to me adding a autotools-time dependency on pkg-config? I want to use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to test for luajit ... J