> On Apr 11, 2016, at 9:48 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2016, at 12:47 PM, James Peach wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> James and I’ve been looking at some changes to clang-format, wanted to take
>>> it here first. Just
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 12:47 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> James and I’ve been looking at some changes to clang-format, wanted to take
>> it here first. Just running the new version of clang-format produces a patch
>> of ab
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> James and I’ve been looking at some changes to clang-format, wanted to take
> it here first. Just running the new version of clang-format produces a patch
> of about 6,500 lines. This is mostly removal of superfluous empty lines
+1, +1, -1. #3 could be a +1 in the future.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016, 12:01 Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> James and I’ve been looking at some changes to clang-format, wanted to
> take it here first. Just running the new version of clang-format produces a
> patch of about 6,500 lines. This is mostly
Hi,
James and I’ve been looking at some changes to clang-format, wanted to take it
here first. Just running the new version of clang-format produces a patch of
about 6,500 lines. This is mostly removal of superfluous empty lines, and
removing a space between a type cast and the variable. These
