I am making a PR for this
Jason
On Sunday, July 9, 2017, 4:03:44 PM CDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 8:00 AM, Alan Carroll
> wrote:
>
> I have PR 2254 which is a conversion of IpMapTest from our internal
> regression test / TestBox to Catch. Overall I think Catch is clearly be
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 8:00 AM, Alan Carroll
> wrote:
>
> I have PR 2254 which is a conversion of IpMapTest from our internal
> regression test / TestBox to Catch. Overall I think Catch is clearly better
> than gtest.
>
So, we could just include this in our source tree, and that’s it?
I have PR 2254 which is a conversion of IpMapTest from our internal regression
test / TestBox to Catch. Overall I think Catch is clearly better than gtest.
Hi all,
There was a talk about using gtest or something else for unit testing. I had
suggested Catch instead, however, I think everyone without looking or trying
anything out said gtest. So to help get a real test written I have various PR
coming with unit tests. I had my interns write tests in
Thanks Gancho. This is very helpful
Karthik
From: Gancho Tenev
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 4:05 PM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unit testing for plugin
Karthik,
If interested in regression / integration testing (trafficserver+plugin
_
> From: Brian Geffon
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:46 AM
> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unit testing for plugin
>
> Take a look at the open pull requests, there are c++ API mocks that are
> hopefully going to land soon too.
>
>
Thanks all. Will follow up on these links
Karthik
From: Brian Geffon
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:46 AM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unit testing for plugin
Take a look at the open pull requests, there are c++ API mocks that are
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Karthik Sivaraman
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> We are planning to maintain a plug-in that does third party feed based URL
> filtering. Are there any recommendations for unit test/regression test
> frameworks? What does trafficserver use for its unit/regression tests?
Take a look at the open pull requests, there are c++ API mocks that are
hopefully going to land soon too.
Brian
On Friday, April 22, 2016, James Peach wrote:
>
> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Karthik Sivaraman <
> karthiksivara...@outlook.com > wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > We are planning to
Have to remember the joy of e-mail at yahoo Let me try to get a good link to
catch
https://github.com/philsquared/Catch
Jason From: Jason Kenny
To: "dev@trafficserver.apache.org"
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Unit testing for plugin
I am planning on
I am planning on proposing the use of philsquared/Catch
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
philsquared/Catch
Catch - A modern, C++-native, header-only, framework for unit-tests, TDD and
BDD | |
|
|
for unit testing as part of my work on fixing up testing ATS within
Hi
We are planning to maintain a plug-in that does third party feed based URL
filtering. Are there any recommendations for unit test/regression test
frameworks? What does trafficserver use for its unit/regression tests?
Thanks
Karthik
On Mar 8, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> So, I took a crack at this and it seems that InkAPI.cc has a mix of API and
> utility code; utility code being calls such as TSUrlSchemeGet().
>
> To me it seems to only make sense to mock API calls such as
> TSPluginRegister() and _TSmall
So, I took a crack at this and it seems that InkAPI.cc has a mix of API and
utility code; utility code being calls such as TSUrlSchemeGet().
To me it seems to only make sense to mock API calls such as TSPluginRegister()
and _TSmalloc(). But how will mocked tests execute code that uses both
Thanks! I’m going to start tinkering around in
https://github.com/maguro/trafficserver
Feel free to watch or, even better, help!
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 25, 2014, at 3:07 PM, James Peach wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>> I wanted to start goofing around with thi
On Feb 24, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I wanted to start goofing around with this in a public place so people can
> comment/participate. Would it make sense to do this on github and if it ever
> gels into something useful I could submit a patch?
Take a look at ci/tsqa. I started a
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> I wanted to start goofing around with this in a public place so people can
> comment/participate. Would it make sense to do this on github and if it ever
> gels into something useful I could submit a patch?
Yep, just fork the official A
I wanted to start goofing around with this in a public place so people can
comment/participate. Would it make sense to do this on github and if it ever
gels into something useful I could submit a patch?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 10, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> +1 a good mocked libra
+1 a good mocked library would be awesome.
Do more experienced ATS developers know of any blockers to us writing a mock
library for testing?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 10, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Shu Kit Chan wrote:
> That's just unit tests for utilities and helper classes for the plugin.
> I also wa
That's just unit tests for utilities and helper classes for the plugin.
I also want a stub library, too, for writing unit tests for plugin.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, James Peach wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:04 AM, James Peac
On Jan 3, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:04 AM, James Peach wrote:
>
>> On Dec 31, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, James Peach wrote:
>>>
On Dec 31, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:04 AM, James Peach wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, James Peach wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 31, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive u
It was part of the unit tests for the cookie remap plugin. I ported the plugin
to ATS along with the unit tests and we are using it in production.
I think it would be best to open source both the stub and the plugin and then
move the stub parts into a common directory. The plugin does use some
On Dec 31, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>> On Dec 31, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
>>
>> There are none.
>>
>>> I'm having problem
On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, James Peach wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
>
> There are none.
>
>> I'm having problems linking my Boost unit tests against the plugin library
>> for ob
On Dec 31, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
There are none.
> I'm having problems linking my Boost unit tests against the plugin library
> for obvious reasons, it's a module not a shared library.
>
> I tried
On Dec 31, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
>>
>> I'm having problems linking my Boost unit tests against the plugin library
>> for obvious reasons,
I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
I'm having problems linking my Boost unit tests against the plugin library, for
obvious reasons, it's a module not a shared library.
I tried setting up an internal static library that the tests would link against
but can
On Dec 31, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
>
> I'm having problems linking my Boost unit tests against the plugin library
> for obvious reasons, it's a module not a shared library.
>
> I tried setting up an
I'm looking for an example of an ATS plugin that has extensive unit tests.
I'm having problems linking my Boost unit tests against the plugin library for
obvious reasons, it's a module not a shared library.
I tried setting up an internal static library that the tests would link against
but can'
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 7/18/12 11:43 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
>>
For these regression tests is it a release requirement that they fully
pass? ie should they pass cleanly when run against the current 3.2.0
release?
>>>
>>> Yep. They only pas
On 7/18/12 11:43 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
For these regression tests is it a release requirement that they
fully pass? ie should they pass cleanly when run against the
current 3.2.0 release?
Yep. They only pass with the default configs though, so have to make
a fresh install and run the re
On 7/18/12 11:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 10:45 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
On 7/18/12 10:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some work
on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have u
On 7/18/12 10:45 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
On 7/18/12 10:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some
work on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit
tests for most of the stuff I write.
On 7/18/12 10:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some work
on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit tests for most
of the stuff I write. I figured I'd first look into what testin
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some
work on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit
tests for most of the stuff I write. I figured I'd first look into
what testing was already in the ATS code base, and se
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some work on a
plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit tests for most of the
stuff I write. I figured I'd first look into what testing was already in the
ATS code base, and see a decent number of tests. However it
37 matches
Mail list logo
