> On Jan 16, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Alan M. Carroll
> wrote:
>
> Friday, January 16, 2015, 4:11:21 PM, you wrote:
>
>> But eventually, the session is handled by a leaf in the acceptor tree. At
>> that point, do we have enough information to know whether to invoke
>> transaction hooks? Maybe blind
Friday, January 16, 2015, 4:11:21 PM, you wrote:
> But eventually, the session is handled by a leaf in the acceptor tree. At
> that point, do we have enough information to know whether to invoke
> transaction hooks? Maybe blind tunneling is the exception here ...
No. For instance, if tr-pass is
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Alan M. Carroll
> wrote:
>
> Friday, January 16, 2015, 12:17:35 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Yeh +1 from me on not firing TXN_START unless it's really HTTP. Though,
>> maybe the right approach is to keep the current event timing, but only fire
>> TXN_START on HTTP port
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:27:29 -0600
"Alan M. Carroll" wrote:
> Friday, January 16, 2015, 12:17:35 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Yeh +1 from me on not firing TXN_START unless it's really HTTP. Though,
> > maybe the right approach is to keep the current event timing, but only fire
> > TXN_START on HTTP po
Friday, January 16, 2015, 12:17:35 PM, you wrote:
> Yeh +1 from me on not firing TXN_START unless it's really HTTP. Though, maybe
> the right approach is to keep the current event timing, but only fire
> TXN_START on HTTP ports?
We still want to fire that event on HTTP transactions on SSL ports
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:01:43 -0600
> Susan Hinrichs wrote:
>
>> I've dug into Lev's observation on the Transaction Start hook and blind
>> tunnels some more. I'd like to pursue two issues so I'm dividing his
>> note into two.
>>
>> As the
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:01:43 -0600
Susan Hinrichs wrote:
> I've dug into Lev's observation on the Transaction Start hook and blind
> tunnels some more. I'd like to pursue two issues so I'm dividing his
> note into two.
>
> As the code currently stands, both TS_HTTP_TXN_START_HOOK and
> TS_HT
I've dug into Lev's observation on the Transaction Start hook and blind
tunnels some more. I'd like to pursue two issues so I'm dividing his
note into two.
As the code currently stands, both TS_HTTP_TXN_START_HOOK and
TS_HTTP_SSN_START_HOOK get called at the start of the session.
TS_HTTP_SSN
