On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 31 Dec 2013, at 00:22, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> Sort of, but it doesn't reload the plugin code itself. A lot if people want
>> to be able to reload an updated .so on a live system. The reason I brought
>> this up is because a future versio
On 31 Dec 2013, at 00:22, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Sort of, but it doesn't reload the plugin code itself. A lot if people want
> to be able to reload an updated .so on a live system. The reason I brought
> this up is because a future version if ATS that supports this presumably need
> to call th
On Dec 30, 2013, at 2:01 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 Dec 2013, at 16:56, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>> Can I count on TSPluginInit() being called only once in the lifetime of a
>>> plugin?
>>
>>
>> Currently, yes.
>>
>> There
On 29 Dec 2013, at 16:56, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Can I count on TSPluginInit() being called only once in the lifetime of a
>> plugin?
>>
>
>
> Currently, yes.
>
> There has been a number of discussions on the topic of making it possi
On Dec 29, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Can I count on TSPluginInit() being called only once in the lifetime of a
> plugin?
>
Currently, yes.
There has been a number of discussions on the topic of making it possible to
reload plugins on a "live" system. Nothing like that is in
Can I count on TSPluginInit() being called only once in the lifetime of a
plugin?
Regards,
Alan