Re: TS API Proposal: TS_FETCH_FLAGS_SKIP_REMAP

2023-08-07 Thread Brian Neradt
+1 On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:40 AM Masakazu Kitajo wrote: > > Could you achieve the same result my making > proxy.config.url_remap.remap_required overridable? > > No, I don't think I can take that approach for OCSP requests. Can we know > which requests are from FetchSM and made by ATS core for

Re: TS API Proposal: TS_FETCH_FLAGS_SKIP_REMAP

2023-08-07 Thread Masakazu Kitajo
> Could you achieve the same result my making proxy.config.url_remap.remap_required overridable? No, I don't think I can take that approach for OCSP requests. Can we know which requests are from FetchSM and made by ATS core for OCSP requests? If it's just that a plugin wants to decide whether a r

Re: TS API Proposal: TS_FETCH_FLAGS_SKIP_REMAP

2023-08-06 Thread James Peach
> On 4 Aug 2023, at 1:45 am, Masakazu Kitajo wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a new flag for FetchSM that'd allow making HTTP > requests for other servers without remap rules regardless of ATS > configuration (proxy.config.url_remap.remap_required). Could you achieve the same result m

TS API Proposal: TS_FETCH_FLAGS_SKIP_REMAP

2023-08-03 Thread Masakazu Kitajo
Hi, I'd like to propose a new flag for FetchSM that'd allow making HTTP requests for other servers without remap rules regardless of ATS configuration (proxy.config.url_remap.remap_required). The motivation is actually not enabling plugins to do the above. The code on master uses FetchSM for OCSP