> On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Susan Hinrichs
> wrote:
>
> I don't have an issue with the re-arrangement. Such a re-arrangement will
> require plugins to be recompiled. Is that something we try to avoid until
> major releases?
Certainly can't break it within a major release. And we sho
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> Hi,
> When looking at apidefs (
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=trafficserver.git;a=blob;f=lib/ts/apidefs.h.in;h=329adf27f9d0fc3fc677c21d5be38e39456dab73;hb=HEAD#l291)
> the SSL hooks appear to be at the end of the hook list. Wh
I don't have an issue with the re-arrangement. Such a re-arrangement
will require plugins to be recompiled. Is that something we try to
avoid until major releases?
Alternatively, we could insert additional pseudo enum's like we
currently have for last to mark ranges of hooks.
On 3/23/2015
Hi,
When looking at apidefs (
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=trafficserver.git;a=blob;f=lib/ts/apidefs.h.in;h=329adf27f9d0fc3fc677c21d5be38e39456dab73;hb=HEAD#l291)
the SSL hooks appear to be at the end of the hook list. While this isn't a
huge problem, in some situations it's helpful to
