jplevyak:svn [55] % make
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh
/home/jplevyak/projects/ts/svn/build/aux/missing --run aclocal-1.11 -I build
cd . && /bin/sh /home/jplevyak/projects/ts/svn/build/aux/missing --run
automake-1.11 --foreign
configure.ac:1185: required file `proxy/config/ssd_stor
John, i submitted my patch to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-745, thank for your help.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:29 AM, John Plevyak wrote:
> Looking at that web page, I can't see the code. If you post it I can
> take a look. The problem is complicated by the fact that deletion
Looking at that web page, I can't see the code. If you post it I can
take a look. The problem is complicated by the fact that deletion
on sata is implicit to some extent because documents are lost
as the write pointer crosses over them. However because they
are scavenged from the directory, it
Hello, recently i have written a patch for supporting ssd, see
https://cwiki.apache.org/TS/ssdsupport.html.
My logic is like following:
(1) If not hit in cache, then request from os, and write the response to
sata
(2) If hit in sata, and need to write content to ram_cache, then writ
Thank you, John. The Part keeps two Directory, it explains them as Directory
A and Directory B, each one contain a header of type PartHeaderFooter, a
group of Dir, and a footer of type PartHeaderFooter. I can't understand why
Part need to keep two Directories? What is each one's usage?
On Tue, Mar
#2 is a very viable option and could be implemented relatively easily.
Here is my proposal. Do not attempt to write full objects into the SSD,
instead use it like the RAM cache as a fragment cache. The semantics
of a fragment cache are much easier (i.e. just a simple hash table rather
than havin
I was not watching the hash build process of the collection of structure
Part, and i think the method proposed need to be improved.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:06 AM, 张练 wrote:
> In https://cwiki.apache.org/TS/ssdsupport.html, we proposed our
> demands.
> In irc log jplevyakg proposed t
In https://cwiki.apache.org/TS/ssdsupport.html, we proposed our
demands.
In irc log jplevyakg proposed three ways for supporting ssd cache.
1) attach to the RAM cache to store the objects. That would be lower
CPU and would lean hard on the SSD and would use RAM to get a decent
repla
