On 04/22/2011 02:17 PM, Alan M. Carroll wrote:
You mean ink_res_sockaddr_union in ink_resolver.h? I just deleted that and
changed all uses to sockaddr_storage. I think it's better to use a standard
type rather than introducing yet another ATS local type. The accessibility it
provided via union
You mean ink_res_sockaddr_union in ink_resolver.h? I just deleted that and
changed all uses to sockaddr_storage. I think it's better to use a standard
type rather than introducing yet another ATS local type. The accessibility it
provided via union will be done by the ip_cast functions.
My gener
- Original Message -
> I have started work on converting ATS to use sockaddr_storage
> internally as much as possible. Looking at some early progress, I
> think I will be taking the approach of storing, passing, and
> returning sockaddr_storage basically everywhere. I will provide a
> num
On 04/22/2011 11:45 AM, Alan M. Carroll wrote:
I have started work on converting ATS to use sockaddr_storage internally as
much as possible. Looking at some early progress, I think I will be taking the
approach of storing, passing, and returning sockaddr_storage basically
everywhere. I will pr
