I used a simple method for analysing the working set of URLs in our
logs. I took the md5 sum of the URLs and bucketed them in hour
groupings. Then I compared periods of time. I first compared a one
hour period to the previous hour and doubled the periods up to 16
hours. Below is the first f
Interesting. Maybe there is a bug in the overflow code. 1/2 is
significant. Is the hot set stable or does it change? Do you fit the
working set? Clubs has more overhead but should be more robust (sans
bugs).
On Apr 27, 2012 4:10 PM, "Bryan Call" wrote:
> I wanted to know if anyone else has d
I would have expected LRU to perform better than that. :-(
-Jason
On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
> I wanted to know if anyone else has done testing on comparing how clfus and
> lru perform for real world traffic.
>
> I noticed that a server using clfus and didn't have the cach
