Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread James Peach
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Alan M. Carroll > wrote: > > Friday, January 16, 2015, 4:11:21 PM, you wrote: > >> But eventually, the session is handled by a leaf in the acceptor tree. At >> that point, do we have enough information to know whether to invoke >> transaction hooks? Maybe blind

Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread Alan M. Carroll
Friday, January 16, 2015, 4:11:21 PM, you wrote: > But eventually, the session is handled by a leaf in the acceptor tree. At > that point, do we have enough information to know whether to invoke > transaction hooks? Maybe blind tunneling is the exception here ... No. For instance, if tr-pass is

Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread James Peach
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Alan M. Carroll > wrote: > > Friday, January 16, 2015, 12:17:35 PM, you wrote: > >> Yeh +1 from me on not firing TXN_START unless it's really HTTP. Though, >> maybe the right approach is to keep the current event timing, but only fire >> TXN_START on HTTP port

Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:27:29 -0600 "Alan M. Carroll" wrote: > Friday, January 16, 2015, 12:17:35 PM, you wrote: > > > Yeh +1 from me on not firing TXN_START unless it's really HTTP. Though, > > maybe the right approach is to keep the current event timing, but only fire > > TXN_START on HTTP po

Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread Alan M. Carroll
Friday, January 16, 2015, 12:17:35 PM, you wrote: > Yeh +1 from me on not firing TXN_START unless it's really HTTP. Though, maybe > the right approach is to keep the current event timing, but only fire > TXN_START on HTTP ports? We still want to fire that event on HTTP transactions on SSL ports

Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread James Peach
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:01:43 -0600 > Susan Hinrichs wrote: > >> I've dug into Lev's observation on the Transaction Start hook and blind >> tunnels some more. I'd like to pursue two issues so I'm dividing his >> note into two. >> >> As the

Re: The desired semantics of HTTP Transaction hooks

2015-01-16 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:01:43 -0600 Susan Hinrichs wrote: > I've dug into Lev's observation on the Transaction Start hook and blind > tunnels some more. I'd like to pursue two issues so I'm dividing his > note into two. > > As the code currently stands, both TS_HTTP_TXN_START_HOOK and > TS_HT